O Modelo de Inovação da Hélice Quíntupla
O aquecimento global como desafio e motor da inovação
Palavras-chave:
Produção do conhecimento, inovação, Hélice Tríplice, Hélice Quádrupla, Hélice Quíntupla, Ecologia social, Aquecimento global, Enconomia do conhecimento, Sociedade do conhecimento, democracia do conhecimentoResumo
O modelo de inovação da Hélice Tríplice se concentra nas relações universidade-indústria- governo. A Hélice Quádrupla incorpora a Hélice Tríplice, acrescentando como quarta hélice o "público baseado na mídia e na cultura" e a "sociedade civil". O modelo de inovação da Hélice Quíntupla é ainda mais amplo e abrangente ao contextualizar a Hélice Quádrupla e ao adicionar a hélice (e perspectiva) dos 'ambientes naturais da sociedade'. A Hélice Tríplice reconhece explicitamente a importância do ensino superior para a inovação. Entretanto, em uma linha de interpretação poderia ser argumentado que a Hélice Tríplice coloca a ênfase na produção de conhecimento e inovação na economia, de modo que seja compatível com a economia do conhecimento. A Hélice Quádrupla já incentiva a perspectiva da sociedade do conhecimento, e da democracia do conhecimento para a produção de conhecimento e inovação. No entendimento da Hélice Quádrupla, o desenvolvimento sustentável de uma economia do conhecimento requer uma coevolução com a sociedade do conhecimento. A Hélice Quíntupla enfatiza a transição socioecológica necessária da sociedade e da economia no século XXI; portanto, a Hélice Quíntupla é ecologicamente sensível. Dentro da estrutura do modelo de inovação da Hélice Quíntupla, os ambientes naturais da sociedade e da economia também devem ser vistos como motores para a produção de conhecimento e inovação, definindo, portanto, oportunidades para a economia do conhecimento. A Comissão Europeia, em 2009, identificou a transição socioecológica como um grande desafio para o futuro roteiro de desenvolvimento. A Hélice Quíntupla apoia aqui a formação de uma situação do tipo ganha- ganha para todos entre ecologia, conhecimento e inovação, criando sinergias entre economia, sociedade e democracia. O aquecimento global representa uma área de preocupação ecológica, à qual o modelo de inovação da Hélice Quíntupla pode ser aplicado com maior potencial.
Referências
Barbier, EB (2009). Rethinking the economic recovery: a global green new deal.
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). http://www.unep.org/ greeneconomy/portals/30/docs/GGND-Report-April2009.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Barth, TD (2010). Konzeption, Messung und Rating der Demokratiequalität. Brasilien, Südafrika, Australien und die Russische Föderation 1997–2006 (2010th ed.). Saarbrücken: VDM-Verlag Dr. Müller.
Barth, TD (2011a). The idea of a green new deal in a Quintuple Helix Model of knowledge, know-how and innovation. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(2), 1–14.
Barth, TD (2011b). Freiheit, Gleichheit, Demokratiequalität: Zur Qualitätsmessung in den Top 20 Demokratien des Democracy Rankings [Freedom, Equality and the Quality of Democracy: Measuring Quality in the Top 20 Democracies of the Democracy Ranking] Dissertation (Doctoral Thesis). Vienna: University of Vienna.
Barth, TD (2011c). Die 20 besten Demokratien der Welt. Freiheit – Gleichheit Demokratiequalität auf einen Blick. 1. Norderstedt/Wien: Auflage, Books on Demand Verlag.
Bhaskar, R (2010). Context of interdisciplinarity: interdisciplinarity and climate change. In R Bhasakar, C Frank, KG Høyer, P Næss, & J Parker (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity and climate change: Transforming knowledge and practice for our global future (pp. 1–24). New York: Routledge.
Biegelbauer, P (2007a). Learning from abroad: the Austrian competence centre programme Kplus. Science and Policy, 34(9), 606–618.
Biegelbauer, P (2007b). Ein neuer Blick auf politisches Handeln: Politik-Lernansätze im Vergleich. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (ÖZP), 36(3), 231–247.
Campbell, DFJ, & Schaller, C (Eds.). (2002). Demokratiequalität in Österreich Zustand und Entwicklungsperspektiven. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Campbell, DFJ, & Güttel, WH (2005). Knowledge production of firms: research networks and the-scientification of business R&D. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(1/2), 152–175.
Campbell, DFJ (2006). In EG Carayannis & DFJ Campbell (Eds.), Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. 67–100). Westport: Praeger.
Campbell, DFJ (2007). Wie links oder wie rechts sind Österreichs Länder? Eine komparative Langzeitanalyse des parlamentarischen Mehrebenensystems Österreichs (1945–2007). SWS-Rundschau, 47(4), 381–404.
Campbell, DFJ (2008). The basic concept for the democracy ranking of the quality of democracy. Vienna: Democracy Ranking. http://www.democracyranking. org/downloads/basic_concept_democracy_ranking_2008_A4.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Campbell, DFJ, & Barth, TD (2009). Wie können Demokratie und Demokratiequalität gemessen werden? Modelle, Demokratie-Indices und Länderbeispiele im globalen Vergleich. SWS-Rundschau, 49(2), 208–233.
Campbell, DFJ, Pölzlbauer, P, & Barth, T D (2010). Das “Democracy Ranking 2010 of the Quality of Democracy” – Erstveröffentlichung (German). Vienna: Democracy Ranking. http://www.democracyranking.org/downloads/ Democracy_Ranking_Concept_Earlyrelease_German_2010.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Carayannis, EG (2004). Measuring intangibles: managing intangibles for tangible outcomes in research and innovation. International Journal of Nuclear Knowledge Management, 1(2), 49–67.
Carayannis, EG, & von Zedtwitz, M (2005). Architecting gloCal (global – local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies. Technovation, 25, 95–110.
Carayannis, EG, & Campbell, DFJ (2006). In EG Carayannis & DFJ Campbell (Eds.), Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. 1–25). Westporti: Praeger.
Carayannis, EG, & Alexander, JM (2006). Global and local knowledge. Palgrave MacMillan: Glocal transatlantic public-private partnerships for research and technological development. Houndmills.
Carayannis, EG, & Formica, P (2006). Intellectual venture capitalists: an emerging breed of knowledge entrepreneurs – viewpoint. Industry and Higher Education, 20(3), 151–156.
Carayannis, EG, & Campbell, DFJ (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.
Carayannis, EG, & Kaloudis, A (2010). 21st century democratic capitalism: a time for action and a time to lead. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 1–13.
Carayannis, EG, & Campbell, DFJ (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. http://www.igi-global.com/ bookstore/article.aspx?titleid=41959.
Carayannis, EG (Ed.). (2011). Planet earth 2011 - global warming challenges and opportunities for policy and practice. Open Access Publisher. http://www. intechopen.com/books/planet-earth-2011-global-warming-challenges-andopportunities-for-policy-and-practice. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Carayannis, EG, & Campbell, DFJ (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix innovation concepts and the “Mode 3” knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 327–372. http://www.springerlink.com/content/d1lr223321305579/.
Carayannis, EG, & Campbell, DFJ (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. SpringerBriefs in business (Vol. 7). New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/book/978-14614-2061-3.
Danilda, I, Lindberg, M, & Torstensson, B-M (2009). Women Resource Centres. A Quattro Helix Innovation System on the European Agenda. Paper. http:// www.hss09.se/own_documents/Papers/3-11%20-%20Danilda%20Lindberg% 20&%20Torstensson%20-%20paper.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Diamond, L, & Morlino, L (2005). Introduction. In L Diamond & L Morlino (Eds.), Assessing the quality of democracy (pp. ix–xliii). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Dubina, I N (2009). Уп р авление тво р чеством пе р сонала в у словиях иннова ц ионной экономики [Creativity Management in the Innovation Economy]. Moscow: Academia.
Dubina, I N, Carayannis, EG, & Campbell, D FJ (2012). Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation, and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 1–24. http://www.springerlink.com/content/ t5j8l12136h526h5/.
Etzkowitz, H, & Leydesdorff, L (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
European Commission. (2009). The World in 2025. Rising Asia and socio-ecological transition. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/the-world-in-2025-report_en.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Fischer-Kowalski, M (1998). Society's metabolism. The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, Part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 61–78.
Fischer-Kowalski, M, & Hüttler, W (1999). Society's metabolism. The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, Part II, 1970–1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), 107–136.
Fischer-Kowalski, M, & Haberl, H (Eds.). (2007). Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Friedman, TL (2008). Hot, flat and crowded: why we need a green revolution – and how we can renew our global future. London: Penguin.
Gibbons, M, Limoges, C, Nowotny, H, Schwartzman, S, Scott, P, & Trow, M (1994).
The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Giddens, A (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press. Green New Deal Group. (2008). A green new deal: joined-up policies to solve the triple crunch of the credit crisis, climate change and high oil price – the first report of the Green New Deal Group. London: New Economic Foundation. http://www.neweconomics.org/sites/neweconomics.org/files/ A_Green_New_Deal_1.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Haberl, H, Fischer-Kowalski, M, Krausmann, F, Weisz, H, & Winiwarter, V (2004).
Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 199–213.
Hopwood, B, Mellor, M, & O'Brien, G (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.
Høyer, KG (2010a). Seven theses on CO ² reductionism and its interdisciplinary counteraction. In R Bhasakar, C Frank, KG Høyer, P Næss, & J Parker (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity and climate change: transforming knowledge and practice for our global future (pp. 35–53). New York: Routledge.
Høyer, KG (2010b). Technological idealism: the case of the thorium fuel cycle. In R Bhasakar, C Frank, KG Høyer, P Næss, & J Parker (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity and climate change: transforming knowledge and practice for our global future (pp. 164–182). New York: Routledge.
Höll, O (2006). Entwicklungspolitik. In H Dachs (Ed.), Politik in Österreich. Das Handbuch (pp. 884–904). Wien: MANZ'sche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung.
Hufbauer, GC, Charnovitz, S, & Kim, J (2009). Global warming and the world trading system. Washington, DC: Person Institute for International Economics.
IPPC. (2007a). Historical overview of climate change science. In S Solomon, D Qin, M Manning, Z Chen, M Marquis, KB Averyt, M Tignor, & HL Miller (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis – the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 93–127). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
IPPC. (2007b). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis – errata for the working Group - fourth assessment report. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-errata.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Kates, RW, Clark, WC, Corell, R, Hall, J M, Jaeger, CC, Lowe, I, McCarthy, JJ, Schellnhuber, HJ, Bolin, B, Dickson, NM, Faucheux, S, Gallopin, GC, Grübler, A, Huntley, B, Jäger, J, Jodha, NS, Kasperson, RE, Mabogunje, A, Matson, P, Mooney, H, Moore, B, III, O'Riordan, T, & Svedin, U (2001). Environment and development: sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.
Krausmann, F, Fischer-Kowalski, M, Schandl, H, & Eisenmenger, N (2008). The global sociometabolic transition: past and present metabolic profiles and their future trajectories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(5), 637–656.
Kreisky, E, & Löffler, M (2010). Demokratietheorieentwicklung im Kontext gesellschaftlicher Paradigmen. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 39(4), 89–104.
Kuhlmann, S (2001). Future governance of innovation policy in Europe – three scenarios. Research Policy, 30, 953–976.
Le Monde diplomatique (Ed.). (2009). Atlas der globalisierung – sehen und verstehen, was die welt bewegt. Paris/Berlin: Le Monde diplomatique/taz.
Lundvall, B-Å (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Meyer, B (2008). Wie muss die wirtschaft umgebaut werden? Perspektiven nachhaltiger Entwicklung, Lizenzausgabe für die bundeszentrale für politische bildung. Frankfurt am Main/Bonn: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
Müller, M, & Niebert, K (2009). Epochenwechsel – plädoyer für einen grünen new deal. München: Oekom Verlag.
Nowotny, H, Scott, P, & Gibbons, M (2003). Mode 2 revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.
O'Donnell, G (2004). Human development, human rights, and democracy. In G O'Donnell, JV Cullell, & OM Iazzetta (Eds.), The quality of democracy. Theory and applications (pp. 9–92). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
OECD. (2009). OECD-Factbook 2009 – economic, environmental and social statistics – special focus: inequality. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010). OECD-Factbook 2010 – economic, environmental and social statistics – special focus: the crisis and beyond. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Otzelberger, A (2011). Gender-responsive strategies on climate change: Recent progress and ways forward for donors. BRIDGE: development – gender. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. http://www.bridge.ids.ac.uk/vfile/ upload/4/document/1107/Gender%20responsive%20strategies%20on% 20climate%20change_progress%20and%20ways%20forward%20for% 20donors.pdf.
Parker, J (2010). Towards a dialectics of knowledge and care in the global system.
In R Bhasakar, C.Frank, K G Høyer, P Næss, & J Parker (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity and climate change: transforming knowledge and practice for our global future (pp. 205–226). New York: Routledge.
Rommetveit, K, Funtowicz, S, & Strand, R (2010). Knowledge, democracy and action in response to climate change. In R Bhasakar, C Frank, K G Høyer, P Næss, & J Parker (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity and climate change: transforming knowledge and practice for our global future (pp. 149–163). New York: Routledge.
Schumpeter, J A (1976). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper Perennial.
Sen, A (2007). Ökonomie für den Menschen – Wege zur Gerechtigkeit und Solidarität in der Marktwirtschaft; Aus dem Englischen von C. Goldmann (4th ed.). München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
Stern, N (2009). The global deal – climate change and the creation of a new era of progress and prosperity. New York: Public Affairs.
Tilly, C (2007). Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ulram, PA (2006). Politische Kultur der Bevölkerung. In H Dachs (Ed.), Politik in Österreich. Das Handbuch (pp. 513–524). Vienna: MANZ'sche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung.
United Nations. (1987a). Report of the world commission on Environment and Development (42/187). New York: United Nations. http://www.un-documents. net/a42r187.htm. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
United Nations. (1987b). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: “our common future”. New York: United Nations. http:// worldinbalance.net/pdf/1987-brundtland.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012. UNDP. (2007). Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting climate change:
human solidarity in a divided world. New York: United Nations Development Program. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2007-2008. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
UNDP. (2010). Human Development Report 2010 (20th Anniversary Edition) – The real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. New York: United Nations Development Program. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/ HDR_2010_EN_Complete_reprint.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
UNDP. (2011). Human Development Report 2011 – Sustainability and equity: a better future for all. New York: United Nations Development Program. http:// hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2011/. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
UNEP. (2008). Green jobs: towards decent work in sustainable, low-carbon world. Washington/New York: United Nations Environment Program. http://www. unep.org/labour_environment/PDFs/Greenjobs/UNEP-Green-Jobs-Report.pdf. Acessado em: 31 March 2012.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Direito, Inovação e Regulações
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
